fixed test262: derived-this-uninitialized-realm.js

This commit is contained in:
Fabrice Bellard 2024-01-06 14:42:43 +01:00
parent bd0b7048de
commit 24aa7ba4f0
3 changed files with 28 additions and 6 deletions

View file

@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ DEF(set_loc_uninitialized, 3, 0, 0, loc)
DEF( get_loc_check, 3, 0, 1, loc) DEF( get_loc_check, 3, 0, 1, loc)
DEF( put_loc_check, 3, 1, 0, loc) /* must come after get_loc_check */ DEF( put_loc_check, 3, 1, 0, loc) /* must come after get_loc_check */
DEF( put_loc_check_init, 3, 1, 0, loc) DEF( put_loc_check_init, 3, 1, 0, loc)
DEF(get_loc_checkthis, 3, 0, 1, loc)
DEF(get_var_ref_check, 3, 0, 1, var_ref) DEF(get_var_ref_check, 3, 0, 1, var_ref)
DEF(put_var_ref_check, 3, 1, 0, var_ref) /* must come after get_var_ref_check */ DEF(put_var_ref_check, 3, 1, 0, var_ref) /* must come after get_var_ref_check */
DEF(put_var_ref_check_init, 3, 1, 0, var_ref) DEF(put_var_ref_check_init, 3, 1, 0, var_ref)
@ -271,6 +272,8 @@ def( leave_scope, 3, 0, 0, u16) /* emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 2 */
def( label, 5, 0, 0, label) /* emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 3 */ def( label, 5, 0, 0, label) /* emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 3 */
/* the following opcodes must be in the same order as the 'with_x' and
get_var_undef, get_var and put_var opcodes */
def(scope_get_var_undef, 7, 0, 1, atom_u16) /* emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 2 */ def(scope_get_var_undef, 7, 0, 1, atom_u16) /* emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 2 */
def( scope_get_var, 7, 0, 1, atom_u16) /* emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 2 */ def( scope_get_var, 7, 0, 1, atom_u16) /* emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 2 */
def( scope_put_var, 7, 1, 0, atom_u16) /* emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 2 */ def( scope_put_var, 7, 1, 0, atom_u16) /* emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 2 */
@ -278,6 +281,7 @@ def(scope_delete_var, 7, 0, 1, atom_u16) /* emitted in phase 1, removed in phase
def( scope_make_ref, 11, 0, 2, atom_label_u16) /* emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 2 */ def( scope_make_ref, 11, 0, 2, atom_label_u16) /* emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 2 */
def( scope_get_ref, 7, 0, 2, atom_u16) /* emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 2 */ def( scope_get_ref, 7, 0, 2, atom_u16) /* emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 2 */
def(scope_put_var_init, 7, 0, 2, atom_u16) /* emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 2 */ def(scope_put_var_init, 7, 0, 2, atom_u16) /* emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 2 */
def(scope_get_var_checkthis, 7, 0, 1, atom_u16) /* emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 2, only used to return 'this' in derived class constructors */
def(scope_get_private_field, 7, 1, 1, atom_u16) /* obj -> value, emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 2 */ def(scope_get_private_field, 7, 1, 1, atom_u16) /* obj -> value, emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 2 */
def(scope_get_private_field2, 7, 1, 2, atom_u16) /* obj -> obj value, emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 2 */ def(scope_get_private_field2, 7, 1, 2, atom_u16) /* obj -> obj value, emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 2 */
def(scope_put_private_field, 7, 2, 0, atom_u16) /* obj value ->, emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 2 */ def(scope_put_private_field, 7, 2, 0, atom_u16) /* obj value ->, emitted in phase 1, removed in phase 2 */

View file

@ -16976,6 +16976,19 @@ static JSValue JS_CallInternal(JSContext *caller_ctx, JSValueConst func_obj,
sp++; sp++;
} }
BREAK; BREAK;
CASE(OP_get_loc_checkthis):
{
int idx;
idx = get_u16(pc);
pc += 2;
if (unlikely(JS_IsUninitialized(var_buf[idx]))) {
JS_ThrowReferenceErrorUninitialized2(caller_ctx, b, idx, FALSE);
goto exception;
}
sp[0] = JS_DupValue(ctx, var_buf[idx]);
sp++;
}
BREAK;
CASE(OP_put_loc_check): CASE(OP_put_loc_check):
{ {
int idx; int idx;
@ -25770,9 +25783,9 @@ static void emit_return(JSParseState *s, BOOL hasval)
label_return = -1; label_return = -1;
} }
/* XXX: if this is not initialized, should throw the /* The error should be raised in the caller context, so we use
ReferenceError in the caller realm */ a specific opcode */
emit_op(s, OP_scope_get_var); emit_op(s, OP_scope_get_var_checkthis);
emit_atom(s, JS_ATOM_this); emit_atom(s, JS_ATOM_this);
emit_u16(s, 0); emit_u16(s, 0);
@ -30109,6 +30122,7 @@ static int resolve_scope_var(JSContext *ctx, JSFunctionDef *s,
case OP_scope_get_ref: case OP_scope_get_ref:
dbuf_putc(bc, OP_undefined); dbuf_putc(bc, OP_undefined);
/* fall thru */ /* fall thru */
case OP_scope_get_var_checkthis:
case OP_scope_get_var_undef: case OP_scope_get_var_undef:
case OP_scope_get_var: case OP_scope_get_var:
case OP_scope_put_var: case OP_scope_put_var:
@ -30134,7 +30148,12 @@ static int resolve_scope_var(JSContext *ctx, JSFunctionDef *s,
} }
} else { } else {
if (s->vars[var_idx].is_lexical) { if (s->vars[var_idx].is_lexical) {
if (op == OP_scope_get_var_checkthis) {
/* only used for 'this' return in derived class constructors */
dbuf_putc(bc, OP_get_loc_checkthis);
} else {
dbuf_putc(bc, OP_get_loc_check); dbuf_putc(bc, OP_get_loc_check);
}
} else { } else {
dbuf_putc(bc, OP_get_loc); dbuf_putc(bc, OP_get_loc);
} }
@ -31279,6 +31298,7 @@ static __exception int resolve_variables(JSContext *ctx, JSFunctionDef *s)
dbuf_putc(&bc_out, op); dbuf_putc(&bc_out, op);
dbuf_put_u16(&bc_out, s->scopes[scope].first + 1); dbuf_put_u16(&bc_out, s->scopes[scope].first + 1);
break; break;
case OP_scope_get_var_checkthis:
case OP_scope_get_var_undef: case OP_scope_get_var_undef:
case OP_scope_get_var: case OP_scope_get_var:
case OP_scope_put_var: case OP_scope_put_var:

View file

@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
test262/test/annexB/language/eval-code/direct/script-decl-lex-collision-in-sloppy-mode.js:13: Test262Error: Expected a SyntaxError to be thrown but no exception was thrown at all test262/test/annexB/language/eval-code/direct/script-decl-lex-collision-in-sloppy-mode.js:13: Test262Error: Expected a SyntaxError to be thrown but no exception was thrown at all
test262/test/built-ins/Function/internals/Construct/derived-this-uninitialized-realm.js:20: Test262Error: Expected a ReferenceError but got a different error constructor with the same name
test262/test/built-ins/Function/internals/Construct/derived-this-uninitialized-realm.js:20: strict mode: Test262Error: Expected a ReferenceError but got a different error constructor with the same name
test262/test/built-ins/RegExp/lookahead-quantifier-match-groups.js:27: Test262Error: Expected [a, abc] and [a, undefined] to have the same contents. ? quantifier test262/test/built-ins/RegExp/lookahead-quantifier-match-groups.js:27: Test262Error: Expected [a, abc] and [a, undefined] to have the same contents. ? quantifier
test262/test/built-ins/RegExp/lookahead-quantifier-match-groups.js:27: strict mode: Test262Error: Expected [a, abc] and [a, undefined] to have the same contents. ? quantifier test262/test/built-ins/RegExp/lookahead-quantifier-match-groups.js:27: strict mode: Test262Error: Expected [a, abc] and [a, undefined] to have the same contents. ? quantifier
test262/test/built-ins/RegExp/unicode_full_case_folding.js:20: Test262Error: \u0390 does not match \u1fd3 test262/test/built-ins/RegExp/unicode_full_case_folding.js:20: Test262Error: \u0390 does not match \u1fd3