We relies on UNREACHABLE's noreturn attribute to eliminate parent's "no return value" warning. However, this was wrapped in a `if(!false)` block, which compilers may not unfold to recognize the noreturn nature.
Currently, there's no way to specify if an assertion should
conditionally occur due to unimplemented behavior. This is useful when
something is only partially implemented (e.g. due to ongoing RE work).
In particular, this would be useful within the graphics code.
The rationale behind this is it allows a dev to disable unimplemented
feature assertions (which can occur in an unrelated work area), while
still enabling regular assertions, which act as behavior guards for
conditions or states which must not occur. Previously, the only way a
dev could temporarily disable asserts, was to disable the regular
assertion macros, which has the downside of also disabling, well, the
regular assertions which hold more sanitizing value, as opposed to
unimplemented feature assertions.
Currently, this was only performing a logging call, which doesn't
actually invoke any assertion behavior. This is unlike
UNIMPLEMENTED_MSG, which *does* assert.
This makes the expected behavior uniform across both macros.
Involves making asserts use printf instead of the log functions (log functions are asynchronous and, as such, the log won't be printed in time)
As such, the log type argument was removed (printf obviously can't use it, and it's made obsolete by the file and line printing)
Also removed some GEKKO cruft.
